Thread:RTFL/@comment-35041984-20190915212547/@comment-34793204-20190915214419

>Every gun page has a Pros and Cons section

Every gun page should not have a Pros and Cons section, which I am working on (there are several issues with other gun pages that have to be fixed as well)

>It is not the same as the Strategies section because it also shows the weaknesses

The weaknesses could easily be put in the Strategies or the Info section and they would fit in just fine, for example "make sure not to play too aggressively with x gun because it takes longer to reload"

>displays the info in a different format.

While brief explanations are nice, almost all of the information in the Pros and Cons section is duplicate information stated elsewhere in the article. There is a point to be made with the length of the entries in the Strategies section, which can also be fixed at some point.

Take the M9 page for example:
 * "High fire rate" - stated in the Strategies section
 * "Can be dual wielded since it's a pistol" - explained in the Info section
 * "2nd fastest reload time behind the P30L" - not duplicate, but could be put in Strategies (e.g. "play aggressively with this gun because it has a fast reload speed")
 * "good when dual-wielded on mobile" - explained in both Info and Strategies
 * "relatively accurate at close range" - all guns are "relatively accurate at close range"
 * "decent damage" - I don't even know why this is listed because the M9 only does 12 damage per shot (spam explained in Strategies, anyway)
 * "can hit melee weapon users at point-blank range due to its small size" - I don't even know what this means


 * "low dps" - contradicts a "pro", explained in Info section
 * "low magazine" - in Strategies and Info
 * "low accuracy" - Strategies
 * "must be clicking continously" - that is any non fully automatic weapon, Strategies
 * "lots of accuracy loss and damage falloff at high range" - not duplicate

My point is - the Pros and Cons section not only just rewords information previously stated, but it is also not as accurate as the Strategies section.