Thread:ThisWikiSucksItHasFactualInaccuracies/@comment-35708317-20180929211416/@comment-37036875-20181001050621

I'm not aware of myself spamming or harrassing anybody, therefore your premise is invalid. If you mean the little "flame war" instigated by KevinAlcain, it was him that instigated it and thus I may not be held accountable.

> But the question remains Are you a sock puppet account?

Stupid question; not only are you "sure" that I'm not, in which such a question need not apply, but suppose I was. What obligation would I have to tell the truth?

> Im sure your not him but... just saying.

If you're "sure [I'm] not [FriedBrick-NEETShame]," then what's the need for the question? The very existence of a question implies that you are not sure by definition.

> I mean you both seem to be walking encyclopedias. Always correcting things and causing disputes.

First of all, the "disputes" caused were not instigated by me, but rather by KevinAlcain. You could call my edits an instigation, but that's just fact checking. I had supposed that blissful ignorance was worse than harsh truths. As for me being a walking encyclopaedia, I know a fair bit of stats, but that's easy to do for anybody even moderately conscientous.

> Are you FriedBrick-NEETShame?

Any answer I give at this point is meaningless; if I say yes, you'll believe me. If I say no, you'll still suspect me. After all, what credence does the word of a suspect have?